Which statement is not true when extending an existing table?

Which statement is not true when extending an existing table?

• A. You must script and configure all required behavior
• B. You can reuse existing fields and behaviors
• C. You can add new fields without coding if possible
• D. You can extend tables across applications without restrictions

Answer: (A)

Extending an existing table relies on inheritance: you make a child table that extends a parent, and the child automatically gains the parent’s fields, forms, rules, and behaviors. Because of this inheritance, you can reuse what already exists instead of rebuilding everything from scratch. You can add new fields without coding by adding dictionary entries on the child table, while still benefiting from the parent’s inherited behavior. Extending across applications is possible, though you work within application scope rules and may encounter certain restrictions in cross-application extensions. The idea that you must script and configure all required behavior ignores the built-in inheritance and platform-provided functionality, which is why that statement isn’t true.

Extending an existing table relies on inheritance: you make a child table that extends a parent, and the child automatically gains the parent’s fields, forms, rules, and behaviors. Because of this inheritance, you can reuse what already exists instead of rebuilding everything from scratch. You can add new fields without coding by adding dictionary entries on the child table, while still benefiting from the parent’s inherited behavior. Extending across applications is possible, though you work within application scope rules and may encounter certain restrictions in cross-application extensions. The idea that you must script and configure all required behavior ignores the built-in inheritance and platform-provided functionality, which is why that statement isn’t true.